The Definition Of Anti Feminism

THE DEFINITION OF ANTI-FEMINISMAnti-feminists are "woman haters" and people who want to dispute women's rights. This is a picture that floats in many people's minds. The origin of this false assumption is the subjective meaning of the word "feminism" and we may derive from it an understanding of what "anti-feminism" probably must be. Many people have a pretty one-dimensional, almost childishly naive, idea of what feminism is. Feminism is for women and their rights and whoever is against feminism should naturally also be against women. At least that is the conclusion which emerges from this simple, crude definition. However, in what follows, we will see that this definition is not only false, but also FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT FROM REALITY. This so-called feminism is put in place to ridicule men as soon as they formulate even legitimate claims for their own sex. With its network of Equal Opportunity Offices and those responsible, it distributes money always in such a way only to serve the female population, and above all is missing at any place where boys and men have to deal with existential problems which require urgent assistance. This so-called feminism will certainly put a monopoly on suffering in the hands of women and excludes men as a gender from compassion of society. In this respect, feminism can confidently be called "gynocentric hegemony." The breeding ground for this hegemony is a perversion of the celebrated Victim-narcissism which, by definition, explains women as eternal victims, and men as eternal perpetrators. A victim is weak, and it raises the question of what should be attractive to assume its role. A victim can also make requests without ever taking responsibility. And even if the victim manages to rise above its tormentors, so the victim may enjoy all the benefits of the weak and the powerful simultaneously, without having to acquire the disadvantages. The resurrected victim remains victim in spite of all acquired powers, is acquitted of any responsibility or guilt, and is even above criticism. The victim therefore mutates to holy with absolute interpretative authority and inviolability. Consider this, on one hand; women today are constantly put on a pedestal, hailed as Alpha-empowered girls, whereas men are vilified as useless flesh, violent, and impulsive. Consider on the other hand the enthusiasm with which again and again the mantric role of the victim is cemented with women.This schizophrenic Feminine Mystique has a system. It defines men as the oppressors, but inferior, whereas the definition of women is one of a nobler and purer people who rise above their oppressors. Basically, this structure can be described as fascistic with a quiet conscience. And just as it should be for an ideology, it is all connected obviously with a promise of salvation. A by women dominated and from "male principle "freed world must be a better one, what else. The feminist interpretative authority is thus at once legitimized in three ways: first, by the victim, secondly, by the woman as the "better human", and thirdly by the promise of salvation in a better, more feminine world. What privileges can't be justified with the elimination of discrimination, can optionally also with female superiority, be justified.WHAT DO ANTI-FEMINISTS STAND FOR? YOUR ENEMY IS NOT WOMEN, AND HERE IS WHY. FEMINISM TODAY HAS TO DO WITH WOMEN AS MUCH AS THE SOCIALIST PARTY HAS TO DO WITH THE WORKING CLASS. Feminism is neither concerned with the population of women as a whole. Likewise, feminism doesn't stand for disputed basic human rights. Anti-feminism today can therefore not be equated with misogyny. The outcry of some left-wing extremist says that anti-feminists try to turn back the wheel to dispute women's emancipation and push them back into the kitchen, is almost considered comical. Why should anti-feminists want this? Why would men like this? Women at the stove and men in the factory? What man wants that? WHAT ANTI-FEMINISTS WANT IS THE END OF THE ZEITGEIST IN WHICH WOMEN ARE HOLY AND MEN WHO SPEAK ARE DEMONIZED. ANTI-FEMINISTS WANT THE END OF A POLICY WHICH PROMOTES WOMEN YET DISCIPLINES MEN. ANTI-FEMINISTS DEMAND THAT MEN ARE GIVEN THE SAME HUMANITY, THE SAME COMPASSION, AND THE SAME SUPPORT AS WOMEN. SO? ARE THESE CLAIMS SO BAD? Translated from German Antifeminismus. HTTP://ANTIMISANDRY.COM/ARTICLES/DEFINITION-ANTI-FEMINISM-80.HTML

Read More

Game Is The Antidote

Here's an addendum to a basic Game maxim: If a man is writing as the token male at a female-oriented publication, his advice regarding male behavior should be considered even less legitimate than female advice: It's a typical but tragic mistake: MRAs wildly overestimate women's power, sexual or otherwise. Men, they insist, are helpless by comparison. But that claim ignores a long and unmistakable history of male domination in human history. And if there's one undeniable truism about our species, it's that the rules are made by the dominant group..... the pain so many men feel from broken relationships, social isolation, and the gnawing sense of personal powerlessness is not women's fault.It's the fault of a rigid code that was set up eons ago, a code that many of us continue to perpetuate. Extricating ourselves from the emotional straitjacket the code forces us to wear requires taking responsibility for our own lives and choices. It requires letting go of blame. And it requires seeing that feminism-with its remarkable claim that biological sex has nothing to with our human potential-is the best avenue for our personal and collective liberation.This is arrant nonsense of the most ignorant and pernicious sort. It is entirely dependent upon the idea that the dominant group - who admittedly are men - are making their decisions based upon what is to the benefit of their entire sex. There is absolutely no evidence that this is the case, Schwyzer simply states this as a postulate despite the fact that human history is absolutely littered with male elites making decisions that are to the direct detriment of the vast majority of their sex.Schwyzer's argument is not only groundless and historically incorrect, but biologically false. Biological sex is absolutely and directly connected to our human potential. Feminism isn't about liberation, much less equality or maximizing human potential, it is about using the force of government to legally cripple men and subordinate their services to the feminist-perceived interests of women. And finally, it is logically absurd. Women are absolutely to blame for the majority of divorces, for denying fathers custody to their children and imposing an ex-relationship tax on their former partners. It is easy to demonstrate that women are completely responsible for the pain they have caused without the need to argue over which sex is responsible for sex-biased family courts because not one single woman has ever been forced to file for divorce, custody, or alimony in the entire recorded history of Man.Women are not passive, helpless creatures who cannot be held responsible for their own actions, they have have chosen to act, and in acting, they are 100 percent responsible for all of the pain that they have inflicted. It's not the fault of some rigid, unarticulated male code that magically prevents a man from staying married when his wife decides she isn't happy anymore or removes his children from him. The demonstrable fact is that feminism is pure and unadulterated evil and is one of the primary causes, if not the primary cause, of the decline of Western civilization. Feminism is the single most poisonous ideology of the 19th and 20th centuries and has amassed a body count that dwarfs that of Communism and Socialism combined. As I have previously written, calling a feminist a feminazi is an insult to the German National Socialist Workers Party.And Game is the antidote to the ideological poison that is feminism. That is why it terrifies feminists. That is why intelligent women who value civilization instinctively support it. Feminism "requires "reducing men to gammas and omegas who fear to question the chains of the Mother State. In most cases, gammatude and omegadom are not natural states, they are behavioral evidence of crimes that have been committed against young boys with the intention of psycho-sexually crippling them in adulthood.Alpha Game 2011

Origin: street-approach.blogspot.com

Read More

Topless Femen Activist Resurfaces And Is Arrested For Snatching Baby Jesus From Vatican

Christmas Day is always bustling at the Vatican because of the gathering of the faithful in St. Peter's Square getting ready to witness the Pope give his Holy Day homily. This Christmas was notable for another reason, the arrest of a bare-chested protestor who had snatched the statue of the Baby Jesus from the Vatican's life-sized nativity scene.

The protestor, a Femen activist named Yana Zhdanova, was being held for questioning by Vatican authorities and could face charges of theft, insults and committing obscene acts in public. Zhdanova had grabbed the statue about an hour after Pope Francis' blessing on Thursday. A Vatican guard detained the woman, quickly covering her with his cape. Zhdanova clutched the statue to her, shouting "God is woman."

This isn't the first time the activist has been arrested for her protests. In 2012, the "Inquisitr" reported that a topless Zhdanova tried to attack the leader of the Russian Orthodox Church, Patriarch Kirill, at the Kiev airport. Written on her body were messages saying to "Kill Kirill" and "Kirill go to hell." She was also fined for attacking a statue of Vladimir Putin in June. According to a report by "NBC News", written on her bare breasts was the message "Kill Putin."

Zhdanova is a member of a feminist protest group called Femen. They were founded in the Ukraine in 2008, but now they are based out of Paris. They claim to have approximately 30 activists in France, but other women usually join their protests. The group is known for protesting topless against sex tourism, homophobia, religious institutions and many other national and international topics.

As "The Guardian" reported, the Vatican could try Zhdanova as they have the right to try transgressors on their territory or they could hand her over and let the Italian courts handle the prosecution. The Vatican is also holding a businessman, Marcello di Finizio, who had been arrested on Friday for scaling the facade of St. Peter's Basilica in protest over an EU directive.

Rev. Federico Lombardi, a Vatican spokesperson, said the Zhdanova incident would be taken seriously because of the location and the solemnity of the event that was interrupted. He said the incident was done to "intentionally offend the religious feelings" of those who had been present.

As "Yahoo! News" reported, the Vatican was targeted by Femen last month when three members of the group bared their breasts in protest over the pope's visit to the European Parliament. However, this is the first time the Vatican has detained any of their members. The Zhdanova arrest seems to be a message for the group according to Lombardi.

"It is therefore correct to proceed with the appropriate rigor against repeated acts that intentionally, repeatedly and severely infringe on the right of the faithful to the respect of their legitimate religious convictions."

Topless Femen Activist Resurfaces And Is Arrested For Snatching Baby Jesus From Vatican is an article from: The Inquisitr News

Read More